The High Court held the writ petition infructuous after the petitioner established that the payment in question had already been released by the respondents. The petition was immediately dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
245 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-5947-2021 Date of decision : April 21, 2022
M/s Aggarwal Associates
....... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
....... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Akanksha, AAG, Punjab.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH J. (ORAL)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the payment in question has been released to the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) JUDGE
April 21, 2022
sarita Whether speaking / reasoned Whether Reportable:
Yes / No Yes / No
SARITA RANI 2022.04.22 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/s Aggarwal Associates
The State of Punjab
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
