The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, meaning it sought disposal because the subject matter was no longer live.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.4241 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision.18.05.2022
Monika
...Petitioner
Vs
Haryana Staff Selection Commission and others
...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. Yashdeep Nain, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
-.-
JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the instant writ
petition has been rendered infructuous and therefore, seeks disposal of the same as such.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(JAISHREE THAKUR)
JUDGE
May 18, 2022 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.05.25 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Monika
Haryana Staff Selection Commission
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
