Petitioners withdrew the writ petition as the relief sought had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the matter as infructuous, with no detailed reasoning provided in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.327 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision.12.07.2022
Rohit and another
...Petitioners
Vs
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Ms. Sonia G. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, DAG, Haryana.
-.-
JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioners does not press the instant writ petition as the relief sought in the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
| July 12, 2022 | (JA |
ISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Pankaj* | Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether reportable | Yes/No |
PANKAJ KUMAR 2022.07.13 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Rohit and another
State of Haryana and others
JAISHREE THAKUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
