The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition filed by Bachittar Singh in default due to the petitioner's total absence and lack of interest in pursuing the matter despite multiple hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-3229-2020 Date of Decision: 12.10.2022
BACHITTAR SINGH
...... Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
..... Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER
Present: None for the petitioner.
****
LISA GILL, J.
Perusal of the file reveals that none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner on any of the occasions when this writ petition was taken up for hearing. Today, despite the matter being called twice, there is again no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter any longer.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed in default.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
(HARSH BUNGER) 12.10.2022 JUDGE Sunil
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SUNIL 2022.10.14 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Bachittar Singh
State of Punjab
Lisa Gill
Harsh Bungter
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
