Petitioner sought quashing of transfer order. Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous since the petitioner had superannuated during its pendency.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
234 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-4593-CWP-2019 in/and CWP No. 3209 of 2019 DATE OF DECISION: 10.05.2022
Budh Ram …Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others …Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Joy Preet Singh Meelu, Advocate for Mr. J. S. Maanipur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petitioner herein seeks quashing of impugned order dated 30.01.2019 (Annexure P-4) whereby he was transferred within a period of less than one month from Pali Block to Faridabad, which is contrary to the transfer policy dated 06.10.2004 (Annexure P-5).
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of
accordingly.
MAY 10, 2022 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2022.05.11 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.
Budh Ram
State of Haryana
ARUN MONGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
