The court disposed of the writ petition as having been rendered infructuous following a specific representation by the petitioner.
The writ petition was disposed of as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Present: Mr.Harkirat S. Jagdev, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Er. Sandeep Suri, Advocate. for the respondent No.2-Bank.
Mr. Anoop Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
.
the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
The said statement is taken on record.
In view of the said statement, the cause in this Writ Petition no
longer survives for adjudication and the same is disposed of as having been
rendered infructuous.
(M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO) JUDGE
(HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN) JUDGE
October 17, 2022 Ess Kay SURESH KUMAR Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes /No. 2022.10.18 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and Whether Reportable : Yes/No integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MS RAMACHANDRA RAO
HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
