Disposed

Surender Kumar Sharma v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC2 Dec 2022CWP/27600/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ceremonial order in a PIL regarding pension and pay fixation. The High Court, without commenting on merits, disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to consider a pending legal notice and pass an administrative order within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to look into the pending legal notice of the petitioner and pass an administrative order within two months.

Surender Kumar Sharma Vs State of Haryana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

102

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CWP NO. 27600 OF 2022 DATE OF DECISION: 02.12.2022

¶4

Surender Kumar Sharma …Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Haryana and others …Respondents

¶7

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶8

Present : Mr. Parth Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl. AG, Haryana.

¶10

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

¶11

Petition herein, inter alia , is for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the claim of petitioner for fixation of his pay at Rs.83,330/- with effect from 01.01.2016 by granting him the benefit of re-fixation of pay with effect from 01.07.2012 after grant of one annual increment or step up of pay with effect from 01.09.2014 (notional) and actual with effect from 01.01.2016 at par with his junior i.e., respondent No.7, along with all consequential benefits including revision of pension, retiral benefits and payment of arrears along with interest @ 12% per annum with effect from the due date.

¶12

Qua his grievance, petitioner has also served a legal notice dated 13.06.2022 (Annexure P-10), but the same has not been adverted by respondents till date. Hence the petition.

¶13

On advance service, learned State counsel appears and submits

¶14

that a decision will be taken by competent authority, either way, on the SHALINI BHATIA 2022.12.05 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶15

pending legal notice dated 13.06.2022 (Annexure P-10) by passing a speaking order.

¶16

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner also seeks decision on the pending legal notice, as suggested by learned State counsel.

¶17

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

¶18

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to look into the pending legal notice dated 13.06.2022 (Annexure P-10) of the petitioner and pass an administrative order, in accordance with law.

¶19

Let the needful be done within a period of 2 months from today.

¶20

Disposed of accordingly.

¶21

DECEMBER 02, 2022 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE

¶22

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶23

SHALINI BHATIA 2022.12.05 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Surender Kumar Sharma v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surender Kumar Sharma v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Bala Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Balbir Singh and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Ujjagar Singh Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Waryam Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Brij Lal Vs Stat Eof Hy and Others

Virender Singh Mali Vs State of Hy and Others