The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy on the petitioners' application to withdraw the petition.
Liberty to avail alternative remedy granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-24696-2022 Date of Decision: 28.10.2022
M/s Guru Nanak Trading Company and another
Vs.
AU Small Finance Bank Limited and another
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present: - Mr.Aditya Dassaur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr.Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy.
Granting liberty as sought, this Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO)
JUDGE
| (H.S. MADAAN) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.10 | .2022 | JUDGE | ||
| ������ | ||||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No | ||
| Whether reportable | : | Yes/No |
VIVEK PAHWA 2022.10.28 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/s Guru Nanak Trading Company and another
AU Small Finance Bank Limited and another
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
H.S. Madan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
