Nirmal Kumari Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Petition was filed in the year 1997 , inter alia , seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 and 2 to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion as Sister Tutor with all consequential benefits.

¶11

Petition was admitted on 07.09.1998.

¶12

When called out for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that by sheer effluxion of time and pendency of the writ petition for more than 24 years before this Court, either it has been rendered infructuous or even otherwise the petitioner seems to have lost interest in pursuing the same.

¶13

Be that as it may, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application in case, any cause of action still survives.

¶14

07.04.2022 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶15

VANDANA 2022.04.08 13:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Nirmal Kumari v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nirmal Kumari v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyavan Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Gurdial Singh and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sube Singh Vs State of Haryana etc.

Anand Dhull Vs State of Haryana and Others

Munish Kumar Sethi Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Katar Singh Vs State of Haryana