Counsel for both parties stated a settlement was reached, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The court disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VIJAY KUMAR AND ANOTHER
CANARA BANK AND OTHERS
Present: Ms. Gurkanwal Kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Counsel for the both sides state that there has been settlement arrived between the parties, and no cause in the Writ Petition survives for adjudication. Therefore, counsel for the petitioners seek to withdraw this Writ Petition.
Having regard to the aforesaid statement of counsel for the parties, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO) JUDGE
(HARMINDER SINGH MADAAN) JUDGE
October 12, 2022 Ess Kay Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes /No. Whether Reportable : Yes/No
SURESH KUMAR 2022.10.12 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Vijay Kumar and Another
Canara Bank and Others
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Harminder Singh Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
