Disposed

Bahadur Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC12 Dec 2022CWP/19125/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed a competent authority to decide a Section 7 petition filed for removal of a Gurudwara's encroachment on Gram Panchayat land within four months. The court declined to express an opinion on the merits of the encroachment.

What did the court decide?

Direction to competent authority to decide the petition under Section 7 of the 1961 Act expeditiously within four months.

Bahadur Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and… — Property and Title | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

(232) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CWP-19125-2022

¶3

Date of Decision: 12.12.2022

¶4

Bahadar Singh and others

¶5

...... Petitioner(s)

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Punjab and others

¶8

..... Respondent(s)

¶9

CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RITU TAGORE

¶10

Present: Mr. Ravish Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶11

Mr. K.S. Kang, Senior D.A.G., Punjab.

¶12

Mr. Vijay Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.5-Gram Panchayat.

¶13

Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for respondents No. 6 to 12.

¶14

¶15

LISA GILL, J.

¶16

Petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking a direction to respondents No.1 to 5 to consider and decide petitioners’ representation dated 24.12.2021 (Annexure P-1) expeditiously and to remove alleged illegal encroachment over a public passage connecting phirni of village Doad, Tehsil Jaitu, District Faridkot with State Highway No.43/Bajakhana-Barnala Road passing through Khasra Nos.2135 and 2139 of village Doad, as described in the writ petition.

¶17

It is asserted that illegal encroachement has been carried out on the passage by respondents No. 6 to 12 and illegal construction has been raised over the said land and no action whatsoever is being taken by the authorities for removal thereof.

¶18

Learned counsel for the State while referrring to Status Report dated

¶19

30.11.2022, filed on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 submits that this writ

¶20

ANJAL GUPTA 2022.12.19 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement

¶21

CWP-19125-2022 {2}

¶22

petition is rendered infructuous as after conducting demarcation of the area and considering demarcation report dated 07.11.2022, petition under Section 7 has been filed for removal of encroachment on land belonging to Gram Panchayat measuring 18 marlas comprising in Khasra No.2136(0-18), which is stated to have been encroached upon by the Gurudwara.

¶23

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Mr. Abhinav Goyal, BDPO, Jaitu, submits that the petition under Section 7 of the 1961 Act has been filed against the Management Committee of the Gurudwara, of which respondents No. 6 to 12 are members.

¶24

Learned counsel for respondent No.5-Gram Panchayat submits that the matter shall be pursued in right earnest and there shall be no effort whatsoever to delay the proceeding which are now fixed for 15.12.2022 in any manner.

¶25

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the petition under Section 7 of the 1961 Act, expeditiously and definitely within a period of four (04) months from the date fixed before it now i.e.15.12.2022 in accordance with law and after affording due opportunity to all concerned.

¶26

It is clarified that there is no expression of opinion on the merits of the controversy regarding encroachment.

¶27

(LISA GILL) JUDGE

¶28

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No

¶29

Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶30

ANJAL GUPTA 2022.12.19 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement

Bahadur Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bahadur Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hartawal Singh(Since Deceased) Thru His Lrs etc. Vs Joint Development Commissioner (I.R.D) Punjab etc.

Panna Ram Vs State of Haryana and Others

Malkit Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Harbhajan Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Sanjeet Vs State of Haryana and Others

Shri Bhagwan and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Others