Disposed

Ankush Kumar v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Aug 2022CWP/18801/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposal of a writ petition seeking direction to grant a No Objection Certificate for the NEET-PG Course 2022 based on an earlier court order regarding service benefits. The court directed authorities to decide the pending representation as the deadline approached.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of directing authorities to decide the representation before the deadline.

Ankush Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CWP-18801-2022 (O&M)

¶3

Date of decision:- 25.08.2022

Dr. Ankush Kumar

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab and others

¶8

...Respondent(s)

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

¶10

Present: Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Avinit Avasthi, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.

¶12

¶13

RAVI SHANKER JHA, C.J. (ORAL)

¶14

The only prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent-authorities to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation for issuance of No objection Certificate (NOC) for participating in the NEET-PG Course 2022 in terms of the order dated 23.11.2021 passed by this Court in CWP-22822-2021 titled as Dr. Narinder Singh and others Vs State of Punjab and others as well as other two connected writ petitions, wherein the State of Punjab had undertaken to re-consider the cases by granting benefit of services rendered in ‘C’ and ‘D’ categories in terms of the earlier policy dated 18.04.2013 and make the subsequent policy dated 26.11.2020 operative from that date.

¶15

Mr. Avinit Avasthi, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from the authorities, submits that the petitioner’s representation has already been considered and rejected on 18.08.2022. However, the said order is a non-speaking one. He further submits that the matter will be taken up and decided by the authorities by giving reasons and as the last date for issuing the NOCs is tomorrow i.e. 26.08.2022, the said exercise will be completed during the course of the day itself and the order shall be communicated to the petitioner accordingly.

¶16

In view of the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the statement of learned State counsel, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms thereof.

¶17

(RAVI SHANKER JHA) CHIEF JUSTICE

¶18

(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE

¶19

25.08.2022

¶20

Amodh Sharma

¶21

Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
Whether reportable	Yes/No

¶22

AMODH SHARMA 2022.08.26 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Ankush Kumar v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankush Kumar v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parminder Singh Bariana Vs Punjab Vidhan Sabha and Ors.

M/S Corporate House Keeping Services Private Limited and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd. and Anr. Vs Rajbir and Anr.

Charanjit Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Others

M/S Omega Elevators Vs Union Territory Chandigarh and Another

Chain Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others