Disposed
Bishamber Dayal v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/18264/1996
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.330
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-18264-1996 Date of decision: 06.04.2022
Bishamber Dayal …Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana and another …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Additional A.G., Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petition was filed in the year 1996 , for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus inter alia directing the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer from the date when his juniors have been promoted.
Petition was admitted on 17.12.1997 and it was ordered to be heard on 16.02.1998 high up in the list.
When called out for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that by sheer effluxion of time and pendency of the writ petition for more than 25 years before this Court, either it has been rendered infructuous or even otherwise the petitioner seems to have lost interest in pursuing the same as petitioner must have been retired by now.
Be that as it may, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application in case, any cause of action still survives.
06.04.2022 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
VANDANA 2022.04.08 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.
Bishamber Dayal
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court