Petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to approach competent authority. Disposal no substantive order. Thin order.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach other forums.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-17225-2022 (O&M) Date of decision:- 18.08.2022
Ramesh Malik
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
Present: Mr. Ramesh Malik, Advocate (petitioner-in-person).
Mr. Ashish Rawal, Senior Panel Counsel (UOI), for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Deepak Balyan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
RAVI SHANKER JHA, C.J. (ORAL)
The petitioner, appearing in person, after arguing at length prays
for and is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to take up the remedies available to him under law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(RAVI SHANKER JHA) CHIEF JUSTICE
(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE
18.08.2022
Amodh Sharma
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | Yes/No |
AMODH SHARMA 2022.08.22 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ramesh Malik
Union of India
Ravi Shanker Jha
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
