Khurshid Ahmed v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
207
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 15189 of 2018 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 06.01.2022
Khurshid Ahmed …Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others …Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.
(Presence marked through video conferencing).
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the
petition with liberty to file the same with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
JANUARY 06, 2022 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
MAHAVIR SINGH 2022.01.06 18:53 I attest to the accuracy of this order.
Khurshid Ahmed
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court