Disposed
Rakesh Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/14455/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
th case) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
What the court decided
AI extract
th case) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
216 (4th case)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-14455-2020 Date of decision: 21.10.2022
Rakesh Kumar ...Petitioner
VS
State of Haryana and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: Mr. Balwan Singh, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Kundu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K.S.Brar, Additional A.G., Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel submits that per his instructions claim of
the petitioner is rendered infructuous as during pendency of the writ petition his name has been recommended for appointment and appointment letter is in
process of being issued.
Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE
October 21, 2022 Vandana
���������������������������� ������� �������������������� ��������
VANDANA 2022.10.26 01:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/ Decree/ Document, which is scanned copy of the original\
Rakesh Kumar
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court