The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a 21-year-old writ petition for quashing orders rejecting service regularization claims. The court noted the petitioners' non-appearance and deemed the matter infructuous despite no specific order to do so.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
468 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-13677-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision:27.10.2022
Israil and another …..Petitioners
Versus Haryana State and others ..…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petition herein, inter alia , is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing orders dated 20.04.2001 (Annexures P-6 and P-7) whereby the claim of the petitioners for regularization of services w.e.f. 01.02.1996 on Class IV post was rejected.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE
October 27, 2022 ashish
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
ASHISH 2022.10.28 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for quashing rejection of service regularization claims should be dismissed after non-appearance of petitioners for over 21 years?
ISRAIL AND ANOTHER
HARYANA STATE AND OTHERS
ARUN MONGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
