Application for withdrawal of a writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner affirmed compliance with the Insurance Ombudsman order. The main case was fixed for hearing and ultimately dismissed.
The main case was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CM No. 4813-CWP-2022 in/and CWP No. 12586 of 2021
-1-
103
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM No. 4813-CWP-2022 in/and CWP No. 12586 of 2021 Date of Decision: 02.04.2022
Bharti General Insurance Company Ltd.
-Petitioner
Versus
Insurance Ombudsman and another
-Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Sachin Ohri, Advocate, for the petitioner. ****
RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral)
CM No. 4813-CWP-2022
This is an application under Section 151 CPC for
withdrawal of the main case which is already fixed for 19.09.2022.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the order of Insurance Ombudsman has already been complied with and the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition anymore.
Learned counsel further submits that office of Mr. Shubham Goyal, Advocate, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has already been informed.
JYOTI SHARMA 2022.04.02 13:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CM No. 4813-CWP-2022 in/and CWP No. 12586 of 2021
-2-
In view of above, the date of hearing is preponed and
the main case is taken up today.
Main case
Dismissed as withdrawn.
02.04.2022 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) Jyoti Sharma JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
JYOTI SHARMA 2022.04.02 13:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bharti General Insurance Company Ltd.
Insurance Ombudsman
Another
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
