Petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to approach the concerned Tehsildar for demarcation work.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Tehsildar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
114 CWP No. 12447 of 2022 Date of Decision:- 22.09.2022
NAZAR SINGH
....Petitioner
vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ....Respondents ***
BEFORE :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL
Present:Mr. Kanish Jindal, Advocate for Mr. Arun Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. ***
Sudhir Mittal, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel submits that the representations referred to in the writ petition have in fact not been submitted in the office of the Deputy Commissioner. The petitioner may approach the Tehsildar concerned within seven days from today whereafter demarcation would be done within the following three weeks.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the concerned Tehsildar.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty.
September 22, 2022 ( SUDHIR MITTAL) poonam JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
POONAM RATHORE 2022.09.26 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nazar Singh
State of Punjab and Ors
Sudhir Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
