The single-judge bench disposed of a writ petition as infructuous after the State counsel informed the court they were taking steps to withdraw the impugned proposed seniority list.
Disposed as infructuous; petitioners at liberty to revive proceedings if list not withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
111
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANIDGARH
CWP No. 1192 OF 2022
DATE OF DECISION : 19.04.2022
Shashi Bhushan and others …Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and another …Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Surender Pal., Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sharan Sethi, Addl. AG, Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel submits that per his instructions, steps
are being taken to withdraw the impugned proposed seniority list.
not withdrawn by the respondents.
APRIL 19, 2022 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2022.04.19 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.
Shashi Bhushan and others
State of Haryana and another
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
