Disposed

Ashok Yadav v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC2 Nov 2022CWP/10929/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the court disposed of a PETITION challenging the selection result. Finding that the petitioner was recommended for appointment, the court held the writ infructuous but directed the appointing authority to issue the appointment letter within 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed as infructuous; needful done expeditiously; appointment letter to be issued within 30 days.

Ashok Yadav Vs State of Haryana and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

238

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

¶3

CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP No.10929 OF 2019 (O&M)

¶5

DATE OF DECISION: 02.11.2022

¶6

Ashok Yadav …Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Haryana and others …Respondents

¶9

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶10

Present : None for the petitioner.

¶11

Ms. Manmehak, Law Officer, Haryana Staff Selection Commission in person.

¶12

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

¶13

Petition herein, inter alia , is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of impugned final result dated 04.10.2018 (Annexure P-4), whereby candidature of the petitioner to the post of Veterinary Livestock Development Assistant has been ignored, without him being successful and eligible. Further prayer has been made to direct respondents to consider the candidature of petitioner for the post in question as being successful candidate in BC-B category.

¶14

Ms. Manmehak, Law Officer from the office of respondent No.2-HSSC is present in Court. She has tendered a copy of office order dated 15.09.2022, which is taken on record and marked as Annexure ‘A’. SHALINI BHATIA She further states that during the pendency of writ proceedings, claim of 2022.11.03 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/ Decree/ Document, which is scanned copy of the original\

¶15

the petitioner for appointment to the post of Veterinary Livestock Development Assistant has been accepted and a favourable recommendation has already been made to the Director General, Animal Husbandry and Dairying Department, Haryana and further steps are underway for issuance of appointment letter.

¶16

In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. However, given that the petitioner continues to be out of job for no fault of his, it is expected to issue appointment letter to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible.

¶17

Let the needful be done as expeditiously as possible, but not later than 30 days.

¶18

Disposed of in above terms.

¶19

NOVEMBER 02, 2022 (ARUN MONGA) Shalini JUDGE

¶20

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶21

SHALINI BHATIA 2022.11.03 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/ Decree/ Document, which is scanned copy of the original\

Ashok Yadav v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Yadav v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahender Pal and Anr. Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission

Jaswinder Singh Vs State of Haryana etc.

Rajat Vs State of Haryana and Others

Nitin Dahiya Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission

Lalit Kumar Vs Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission

Rajni and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others