This order dismisses a 22-year-old writ petition filed for promotion due to lack of petitioner representation, ruling that the cause of action appears lost.
Petition disposed with liberty to file an appropriate application if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.538
CWP-10538-1999 (O&M) Date of decision: May 17, 2022
Ram Dass ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and Others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. R.D. Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. *********
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petition was filed in the year 1999, inter alia , for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing orders dated 29.03.1996 (Annexure P-3), 04.11.1997 (Annexure P-6), 04.06.1998 (Annexure P-7) and 24.11.1998 (Annexure P-8) and seeking directions to respondents to promote the petitioner as Clerk with effect from the date, his juniors i.e., respondents No.4 to 20, had been promoted.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE
May 17, 2022 ashish
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
ASHISH 2022.05.25 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ram Dass
State of Haryana
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
