Varsha Sharma and Another v. State of Punjab and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2022 113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
of 2022 113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRWP No.1088 of 2022
113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.1088 of 2022
Date of Decision: 07.02.2022
Varsha Sharma & anr.
...Petitioner
Versus State of Punjab & ors.
…Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Ms. Amandeep Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Harsimar Singh Sitta, AAG, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
At the outset, learned State counsel submits that he has received instruction from SI Nirmal Singh, who has informed that he has recorded statements of the petitioners and there is no threat perception to them.
Given above, since nothing survives in the petition, the same is disposed
of.
However, still in case of any threat perception, the petitioners may approach the concerned Superintendent of Police/SHO for providing appropriate protection to the petitioners. After that, the concerned officers shall extend the protection on day-to-day analysis of the ground realities or upon the oral or written request of the petitioners. This order shall remain in force for two weeks from today.
The petitioners are at liberty to approach this Court in case need arises.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE February 07, 2022 AK Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No .
ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.02.07 13:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Varsha Sharma
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court