Petitioner's criminal revision petition was dismissed as infructuous since he had already completed his sentence. No substantive legal issue was decided.
The criminal revision petition (CRR-226-2019) was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
233
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-226-2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 08.09.2022
Sukhwinder Pal Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Bhupinder Kumar Dhawan
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present : Mr. Gurbir Singh, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Pal Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Mr. K.R. Dhawan, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent and files his Power of Attorney in Court today. The same is taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has completed his sentence.
Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructous.
| September | 08, 2022 |
(PANKAJ JAIN) |
|---|---|---|
| Dpr | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
|
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
DEEPAK KUMAR 2022.09.08 21:12 I attest to the accuracy of this document
Sukhwinder Pal Singh
Bhupinder Kumar Dhawan
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
