Allowed

Karamvir Singh v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Jul 2022CRM-M/7687/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court accepted the petitioner's petition for anticipatory bail in a case under the Punjab Excise Act. Converting interim directions into absolute bail, the court granted relief subject to cooperation with the investigation and adherence to statutory conditions.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail directions converted into absolute bail, conditioned on joining the investigation when called and abiding by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Karamvir Singh Vs State of Punjab — Anticipatory Bail | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh

¶2

CRM-M-7687-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:-29.7.2022

¶3

Karamvir Singh … Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

... Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

¶8

Present:Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Luvinder Sofat, AAG, Punjab, assisted by ASI Angrej Singh.

¶10

¶11

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)

¶12

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered vide FIR No.12 dated 31.1.2022, Police Station Shambhu, District Patiala, under Sections 61, 1, 78(2) of Punjab Excise Act, 1914.

¶13

At the time of issuance of notice of motion, the following order was passed on 23.2.2022:

¶14

“The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered vide FIR No.12 dated 31.1.2022, Police Station Shambhu, District Patiala under Sections 61, 1, 78(2) of Punjab Excise Act, 1914.

¶15

The allegations, in nutshell, as levelled in the FIR are to the effect that on 31.1.2022, during the course of checking, the police party

¶16

PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.07.29 16:51 I attest to the authenticity and integrity of this document

¶17

( 2 ) CRM-M-7687-2022 (O&M)

¶18

intercepted a Bolero vehicle bearing registration No.PB-29X-0539, which was being driven by one Gurmeet Singh and in which Jagroop was sitting on the front passenger seat. A search of the vehicle led to recovery of 1500 bottles of liquor meant to be sold in U.T., Chandigarh. The aforesaid persons could not produce any license or permit to justify possession of 1500 bottles of liquor. It is further the case of prosecution that on 2.2.2022 Gurmeet Singh made a disclosure statement to the effect that the aforesaid liquor had been procured through Karamvir Singh (petitioner).

¶19

Learned counsel submits that no recovery whatsoever was ever effected from the petitioner and infact he was never ever found near the place of occurrence. It has been submitted that the petitioner has been nominated on the basis of a disclosure statement, which would hardly carry any evidentiary value. Notice of motion for 29.7.2022.

¶20

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Arresting/Investigating Officer and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.”

¶21

Learned State counsel, upon instructions from ASI Angrej Singh, has informed that pursuant to interim directions, the petitioner has since joined investigation and he is not required for any custodial interrogation. Learned State counsel has informed that the petitioner is not involved in any other case.

¶22

Having regard to the aforestated position, wherein the petitioner is stated to have joined investigation and is not required for any custodial interrogation and he is not stated to be involved in any other case, the petition is accepted

¶23

PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.07.29 16:51 I attest to the authenticity and integrity of this document

¶24

( 3 ) CRM-M-7687-2022 (O&M)

¶25

and the interim directions issued by this Court vide order dated 23.2.2022 are hereby made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶26

29.7.2022 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No

¶27

PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.07.29 16:51 I attest to the authenticity and integrity of this document

Karamvir Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karamvir Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjit Singh Vs State of Punjab

Sumandeep Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Roshan Lal Vs State of Punjab

Shyam Lal Vs State of Haryana

Jatinderpal Singh Grewal @ Gobind and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Balkar Singh Vs State of Punjab