Petitioner filed a petition for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Counsel submitted the petition had become infructuous due to the petitioner's conviction. The court accepted the submission and dismissed the petition without adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-6068-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 17.8.2022
Rahul @ Murgi … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Harsh Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Dilpreet Singh Gandhi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Luvinder Sofat, AAG, Punjab.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned State counsel submits that the instant petition filed under the provisions of Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been rendered infructuous since the petitioner has been convicted.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed having been rendered infructuous.
| 17.8.2022 mohan |
(GURVIN | DER SINGH GILL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
MOHAN SINGH 2022.08.17 05:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Rahul @ Murgi
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
