Petitioners sought to set aside their declaration as proclaimed offenders. The court found the petition became infructuous due to a non-bailable warrant order and dismissed it without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
232
CRM-M-4668-2020 Date of Decision:08.12.2022
Sukhmander Singh and Another ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioners
Mr. Digvijay Nagpal, AAG, Punjab
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
The petitioners through instant petition are seeking setting aside of order dated 19.11.2019 (Annexure P-4) whereby trial Court has declared petitioners as proclaimed offenders in FIR No.214 dated 14.08.2017 (Annexure P/1) under Sections 341, 342, 160, 323, 148, 149 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Nathana, District Bathinda.
The petitioners, vide order dated 03.02.2020 were directed to appear before trial court within 7 days and trial court was directed to release the petitioner on interim bail.
Learned State counsel submits that as per order dated 11.11.2022 passed by JMIC, Bathinda, non-bailable warrants have been issued against petitioners.
In view of order dated 11.11.2022 passed by JMIC, Bathinda, the present petition has become infructuous.
No further order is warranted. Dismissed as infructuous.
08.12.2022
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
Mohit Kumar
MOHIT KUMAR 2022.12.09 09:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Sukhmander Singh
Another
State of Punjab
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
