A petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing a summoning order was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner was acquitted by the trial Court on 14.02.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-44689-2018
Date of Decision: 18.08.2022
Arjun Singh
.... Petitioner
Versus
Ram Bilash
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA
Present: - Mr. M.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner.
ASHOK KUMAR VERMA, J. (ORAL)
The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing order dated 23.07.2018 (Annexure P-2) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul whereby the trial Court was directed pass summoning order in the complaint case against the petitioner.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such, as the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial Court vide judgment dated 14.02.2022.
In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
August 18, 2022 (ASHOK KUMAR VERMA) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2022.08.18 19:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Arjun Singh
Ram Bilash
Ashok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
