Petitioner moved the High Court of Punjab and Haryana seeking withdrawal of the present petition after the prosecution evidence was recorded. The State counsel did not oppose, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-315-2022
Date of Decision:- 13.12.2022
RAJAT KUMAR ALIAS TINKU
… Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
... Respondent(s)
-.-
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH
-.-
Present:Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Nagra, AAG, Punjab.
-.-
KARAMJIT SINGH, J . (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner made statement that the entire prosecution evidence has been recorded and as such he be allowed to withdraw the present petition, at this stage.
The aforesaid prayer is not opposed by the State counsel.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( KARAMJIT SINGH) 13.12.2022 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot
Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No
GAURAV SOROT 2022.12.14 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order, judgment and documents.
Rajat Kumar Alias Tinku
State of Punjab
Karamjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
