Disposed

Jagdeep Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC23 Nov 2022CRM-M/2251/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment clarifies that the High Court can quash non-compoundable criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. if parties have amicably settled the dispute, provided the offence is not heinous or of public policy nature.

What did the court decide?

Based on settled principles regarding Section 482 Cr.P.C., the judgment outlines the power to quash proceedings upon compromise, though the specific order for this case is not detailed in the provided

Jagdeep Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and… — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

��

��

��

�� 

�� !"!�#$��%��%��

��&��&�� ��

��

&��& ��

��$��'�(��%��&��&�(

��

�� !��"��

��#��!�� $��

%%%%

��&�(�)��%�*�+�,-

¶15

&��!��'()�����+!�� ,-��)./��0/�01�)0)2��!��3).��3)'��3)3��'/)� 3'2��2'(��2'1��')4��-�*�5��'/��2(.06�� $��5��7!��826�� +!��$��"�� $��$��9��20�02�)0))�5��7!��8)6�

¶16

-��$��02�0)�)0))��*�!�� *��!��!"$��)(�0'�)0))� &��7��"��#��8

¶17

��

¶18

ASGAR ALI 2022.11.23 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

��

��

��

�� !��" �"��#��"�� $��%%%&'(�)�� *

¶23

��$��-��:��#��"��&�� !��$��)(�0'�)0))��!"$��"� ��&��!��

¶24

;��!��!��$ �-�� :��!"$��"��,-��+!�� #��$��$��+!��

¶25

��!�� !��$��< ��  �� �� !� ��"�#$��%��!��&��'��())� ��#� �!��=��>��<"��!��$��!�� ' **_�$��+�,�� !��,��)�-�_ � #�� #��#��>���!��!��'()����*��+!��8 ��$��!��"��"��$��$��"��#�� !��

¶26

�11. True it is that offences which are ‘noncompoundable’ cannot be compounded by a criminal court in purported exercise of its powers under Section 320 Cr.P.C. Any such attempt by the court would amount to alteration, addition and modification of Section 320Cr.P.C, which is the exclusive domain of Legislature. There is no patent or latent ambiguity in the language of Section 320Cr.P.C., which may justify its wider interpretation and include such

¶27

ASGAR ALI 2022.11.23 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶28

�� 

¶29

offences in the docket of ‘compoundable’ offences which have been consciously kept out as noncompoundable. Nevertheless, the limited jurisdiction to compound an offence within the framework of Section 320Cr.P.C. is not an embargo against invoking inherent powers by the High Court vested in it under Section 482Cr.P.C. The High Court, keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of a case and for justifiable reasons can press Section 482Cr.P.C. in aid to prevent abuse of the process of any Court and/or to secure the ends of justice.

¶30

12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable. The High Court can indubitably evaluate the consequential effects of the offence beyond the body of an individual and thereafter adopt a pragmatic approach, to ensure that the felony, even if goes unpunished, does not tinker with or paralyze the very object of the administration of criminal justice system.

¶31

13. It appears to us that criminal proceedings involving non-heinous offences or where the offences are pre-dominantly of a private nature, can be annulled irrespective of the fact that trial has already been concluded or appeal stands dismissed against conviction. Handing out punishment is not the sole form of delivering justice. Societal method of applying laws evenly is always subject to lawful exceptions. It goes without saying, that the cases where compromise

¶32

ASGAR ALI 2022.11.23 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶33

��

¶34

��

¶35

is struck post-conviction, the High Court ought to exercise such discretion with rectitude, keeping in view the circumstances surrounding the incident, the fashion in which the compromise has been arrived at, and with due regard to the nature and seriousness of the offence, besides the conduct of the accused, before and after the incidence. The touchstone for exercising the extra-ordinary power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. would be to secure the ends of justice. There can be no hard and fast line constricting the power of the High Court to do substantial justice. A restrictive construction of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. may lead to rigid or specious justice, which in the given facts and circumstances of a case, may rather lead to grave injustice. On the other hand, in cases where heinous offences have been proved against perpetrators, no such benefit ought to be extended, as cautiously observed by this Court in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors.3 and Laxmi Narayan (Supra).

¶36

14. In other words, grave or serious offences or offences which involve moral turpitude or have a harmful effect on the social and moral fabric of the society or involve matters concerning public policy, cannot be construed betwixt two individuals or groups only, for such offences have the potential to impact the society at large. Effacing abominable offences through quashing process would not only send a wrong signal to the community but may also accord an undue benefit to unscrupulous habitual or professional offenders, who can secure a ‘settlement’ through duress, threats, social boycotts, bribes or other dubious means. It is well said that “let no guilty

¶37

ASGAR ALI 2022.11.23 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶38

��

¶39

��

¶40

man escape, if it can be avoided.*

¶41

,��$��!��,-��&�� *�!��$��$��"��#�� $��"��!��!��!��!� �!��#�!��"��"��!��&�� 8��$��!��$��!��!�� !"��&��"�� !��#�!��!��#�� !�"��!��$��#��8?��#��!�� "!��

¶42

-��# ��"��!$�� "��#��#��

¶43

,-��)./��0/�01�)0)2��!��3).��3)'� 3)3��'/)��3'2��2'(��2'1��')4��-�*�5��'/��2(.06�� $��5��7!��826�� +!��$ ��+!��+!�� 5�6�

***��&�(��**

)3�22�)0))

!��

@��?��9�� A��9�� +��,�� -��'$�

¶48

ASGAR ALI 2022.11.23 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Jagdeep Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdeep Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Case details

Similar cases

Azad Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Satinder Jit Singh @ Bhalu and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Another

Jagat Ram Vs State of Haryana and Another

Rashpal Singh Vs Kartarpur Primary Cooperative Agricultural Dev Bank Ltd. Kartarpur

Baldev Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another

Ashok Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Another