Allowed

Maan Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC17 Jan 2022CRM-M/1966/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an FIR underSections 498-A and 406 IPC, holding that the dispute was settled and the petitioner had cooperated with the investigation., making the previous order absolute.

What did the court decide?

The petition for anticipatory bail was allowed and the order dated 15.11.2021 was made absolute subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Maan Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab — Dowry and Cruelty | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

CRM-M-1966-2020

[ 1 ]

205

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

CRM-M-1966-2020 Date of Decision: 17.01.2022

¶6

Maan Singh and another..........................................Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab........................................................... Respondent

¶9

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

¶10

(through video conferencing)

¶11

Present: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab.

¶13

Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate for the complainant.

¶14

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (Oral)

¶15

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.170 dated 28.12.2019 under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC registered at Police Station Chhajli, District Sangrur.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance of order dated 15.11.2021, the petitioner had joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that the dispute stands amicably settled between the parties. Therefore, the present petition be allowed.

¶17

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Pinjor Singh, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. She further submits that in the wake of RUPINDER KAUR 2022.01.18 11:42 the parties having amicably resolved their dispute a cancellation report was filed I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

CRM-M-1966-2020

¶19

[ 2 ]

¶20

before the trial court concerned and, which has been accepted.

¶21

I have heard the learned counsel.

¶22

In the facts and circumstances as enumerated above, the instant petition is allowed and order dated 15.11.2021 is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶23

( MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) 17.01.2022 JUDGE rupi Note: Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable: Yes / No

¶24

RUPINDER KAUR 2022.01.18 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Maan Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maan Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Another

Raj Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Another

Vikas Vs Renu Bala and Anr.

Shalinder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Harjeet Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Kashmir Singh Vs State of Punjab