An interim bail petition under Sections 323, 307, 506, 34 IPC was accepted. The Court ordered release on bond noting that material witnesses had not supported the prosecution and the petitioner had been detained for over a year.
Petitioner released on bail subject to furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court or competent Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-1905-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 1.4.2022
Balwan
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Rao Ajender Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
MOHAN SINGH 2022.04.01 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
- 2 - CRM-M-1905-2022 (O&M)
bail on account of the fact that PW-1 Lali Devi and PW-2 Sudesh did not support the case of prosecution and as such the petitioner also deserves the concession of bail.
| 1.4.2022 | (GURVIN | DER SINGH GILL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mohan | JUDGE | ||
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
MOHAN SINGH 2022.04.01 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail is to be granted to the petitioner accused of infliction of injuries where material witnesses have not supported the prosecution case.
Whether further detention of the petitioner who has already been in jail for over a year is justified given the lack of prosecution support.
Whether the acquittal indicated by non-support of prosecution warrants release on bail.
Balwan
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
