Petitioner sought regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to file a fresh application after material witnesses examined by the trial court.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file fresh bail petition after witness examination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
219
CRM-M-17188-2021 Decided on : 30.08.2022
Kuldeep @ Rahish
. . . Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
. . . Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
PRESENT: Mr. Tanvir Singh Grewal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Dhruv Sihag, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate, for the complainant.
VIKAS BAHL, J. (Oral)
This is the 1st petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.0279 dated 18.06.2020 registered under Sections 302, 323, 506, 148, 149 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station City, Mahendergarh, District Mahendergarh.
Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant have pointed out in the present case that even the material witnesses, namely, Bijender, Sube Singh, Hoshiyar and Krishan have
GEETA RANI 2022.09.02 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-M-17188-2021
2
not been examined so far.
In view of the above-stated position, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition for regular bail before the trial Court after the said witnesses are examined.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
In case, the regular bail application is filed before the trial
Court, the trial Court shall independently consider the same on its merits, in accordance with law.
30.08.2022
geeta
(VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No
GEETA RANI 2022.09.02 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Kuldeep @ Rahish
State of Haryana
Vikas Bahl
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
