Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR based on compromise. Delhi High Court found the petition infructuous as the trial court had already acquitted the petitioners, and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The petition has been disposed of as being rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
��������������������������������������� �����������������������
�����������
����������������
������������������������������
�������������� ������� ���
�����!���������"�#
�$%��&�
���������!'�(�)�������� ��
����������������"�#
�����������������������������������������
!������� ���������� �������������
������*�� �+�,��-�!!�����&.+�� ������� �
��������������������
The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 87 dated 14.4.2018, registered under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149 IPC (Sections 307 and 325 IPC added later on) at Police Station Meharban, District Ludhiana and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 20.3.2019, Annexure P-2.
Learned counsel for UT, Chandigarh on instructions from ASI Ranjiv Kumar informs the Court that the petitioners have already been acquitted by learned trial Court vide judgment dated 27.1.2021, copy of which, has been produced and taken on record as Mark 'A', and thus, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
| ���������� ������������������������� ��/ |
������������������������������ ���������� |
����������������������������������� ��������������� |
|---|---|---|
| 0 �� �������1���2�������� | � ��������3���������� |
������������2������ |
| 0 �� ����������)-� | ���������������������3���������� | ������������������������2������ |
GAURI SHANKER 2022.10.20 08:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3 provisions across 2 enactments
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
