A single-paragraph order disposing of a petition under Section 482 CrPC. The single-bench order holds that no further direction is warranted after the State counsel confirmed that jurisdictional authorities would examine the petitioners' representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
216
CRM-M-14248 of 2022 Date of Decision:.22.12.2022
Paramjit Kaur and another
-----Petitioners
vs.
State of Punjab and others
-----Respondents
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Pranav Handa, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG, Punjab
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
The petitioners through instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure are seeking directions to respondents No. 1 to 3 to decide representation dated 27.9.2021 (Annexure P-1) of the petitioners.
Learned State counsel submits that there were allegations and counter allegations by petitioners and respondents. Learned counsel further submits that jurisdictional authorities would look into the representation of the petitioners.
In view of statement of learned State counsel that jurisdictional authorities would look into the representation of the petitioners, nothing survives and no further order is warranted.
Disposed of accordingly.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
December 22, 2022 paramjit
Whether speaking or reasoned: Yes Whether reportable :Yes/No
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Paramjit Kaur
State of Punjab
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
