In a summary order, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a petition for anticipatory bail. Noting that the petitioner had joined investigation pursuant to an earlier order, the court made the earlier bail order absolute on the same terms.
Earlier order dated 06.04.2022 made absolute on same terms; current petition disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
CRM-M-12604 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-12604 of 2022 Date of Decision: 25.08.2022
Hakam Singh
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA
Present: - Mr. Vikram Preet Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
ASHOK KUMAR VERMA, J. (ORAL)
Short reply dated 20.08.2022 by way of affidavit of Harsimran Singh Bal, Deputy Superintendent of Police (City-II), District S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali), on behalf of the respondent-State, filed in Court today is taken on record.
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.264 dated 15.07.2021 registered under Sections 420, 120-B IPC and Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professionals (Regulation) Act, 2014, at Police Station Sohana, District SAS Nagar (Mohali).
On instructions from ASI Om Parkash, learned State counsel submits that in pursuance of order dated 06.04.2022, petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for interrogation.
In view of above, order dated 06.04.2022 passed by this
RAVINDER SINGH 2022.08.26 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
-2-
CRM-M-12604 of 2022
Court is made absolute on the same terms and conditions.
Disposed of accordingly.
August 25, 2022 (ASHOK KUMAR VERMA) R.S. JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2022.08.26 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hakam Singh
State of Punjab
Ashok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
