The High Court, noting that the petitioner had expired, held the bail petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. as infructuous and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-12190-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 09.8.2022
Girender @ Goldy
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Addl. A.G. Haryana.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has informed that the petitioner has since expired.
In view of the aforestated position, the instant petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.
| 09.8.2022 | (GURVIN | DER SINGH GILL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mohan | JUDGE | ||
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
MOHAN SINGH 2022.08.09 05:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Girender @ Goldy
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
