This is an oral order where Justice Jagmohan Bansal disposed of the matter by referring to a judgment passed on the same date in a related case (Balbir Kaur vs State of Punjab). No separate speaking opinion or reasoning was provided in this entry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
242+2 CRA-S-2216-SB-2017
Date of Decision: 13.12.2022
Pawandeep Singh @ Pawna …Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:Mr. Jasmeet Singh Ghumman, Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Digvijay Nagpal, AAG Punjab
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
For orders, see order of even date passed in CRM-M51831-2022; Balbir Kaur @ Balvir Kaur and Others Versus State of Punjab and Another .
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE
13.12.2022
Mohit Kumar
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHIT KUMAR 2022.12.13 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Pawandeep Singh @ Pawna
State of Punjab
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
