Disposed
Farzana v. Mohammad Bashir Deceased through Lrs and Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/5165/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh…
What the court decided
AI extract
Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
108A
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 5165 of 2017 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 26.05.2022
Mst. Farzana
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Mohammad Bashir (Now Deceased) through his LRs and Another
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Himanshu Puri, Advocate for the respondent No.2.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
CM-22431-CII-2018
In view of the prayer made in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The proposed legal representatives, named in para 2 of the application, are the Class-I heirs of respondent No.1(i)-Hanifa Begum, who are stated to have died on 25.08.2017, who is already on the record as respondent No.1(ii). He is permitted to be brought on record as the legal heir of the respondent No.1(i)-Hanifa Begum,, for the purpose of defending the revision petition.
CM-22477-CII-2018
In view of the prayer made in the application, which is DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJsupported by an affidavit, the same is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2022.06.08 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Civil Revision No. 5165 of 2017 (O&M) 2
The proposed legal representatives, named in para 2 of the application, are the Class-I heirs of petitioner-Mst. Farzana, who is stated to have died on 13.02.2018. They are permitted to be brought on record as the legal heirs of the petitioner-Mst. Farzana, for the purpose of prosecuting the revision petition.
CR-5165-2017
For orders, see a separate detailed order of even date, passed by this Court in Mohammad Salim v. Hanifan (Now Deceased) through her LR and Others (Civil Revision No. 5138 of 2017) .
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge May 26, 2022 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.06.08 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mst. Farzana
Mohammad Bashir
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court