Civil Revision dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner's counsel failed to appear for hearing, with the case having been called twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
101
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 3517 of 2005 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 01.08.2022
Raj Kumar
... Petitioner(s)
Versus Vidya Rattan and Others ... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal. Present: None for the petitioner(s).
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge August 01, 2022 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.08.03 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Raj Kumar
Vidya Rattan
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
