Petitioner's revision petition disposed of as infructuous due to settlement between parties and statement made before trial court.
Revision petition disposed of as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
122
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 264 of 2019
Date of Decision: 10.08.2022
Kamla
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Rohit Kumar and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 and 12.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
as having been rendered infructuous.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
August 10, 2022 “DK”
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.08.22 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Kamla
Rohit Kumar
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
