In Civil Revision No. 181 of 2019, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petitioner's revision petition as infructuous without further reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
120
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 181 of 2019
Date of Decision: 12.12.2022
Ravina Khati
... Petitioner(s)
Versus General Public and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal. Present: Mr. Pankaj Khurana, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Mohan Kansal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Arvind Moudgil, Senior Counsel for Government of India, for respondent No.2 to 4.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
As prayed for by the learned counsel representing the petitioner,
the present revision petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge December 12, 2022 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.12.13 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ravina Khati
General Public
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
