Dismissed

Ujjwal Sahrawat v. M/S Ajay Garments

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Apr 2022CR/1255/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a revision petition filed under Article 226/227 seeking transfer of a rent petition. The petitioner withdrew the petition as her original grievance was redressed after the previously assigned Rent Controller was transferred. The Court directed the Court of Record to decide the rent petition expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn; direction to Rent Controller to dispose of rent petition RP-20 of 2017 by 30.05.2022.

Ujjwal Sahrawat Vs M/S Ajay Garments — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Punjab & Haryana HC (2022)

¶1

-1-

¶2

CR-1255-2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

Date of Decision: 06.04.2022

Mrs. Ujjwal Sahrawat

.... Petitioner

Versus

M/s Ajay Garments

.... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA

¶11

Present: - Petitioner-Mrs. Ujjwal Saharawat, represented through her SPA Dr. Tammanna R. Sahrawat, who is present in person.

¶12

Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

¶13

ASHOK KUMAR VERMA, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Power of attorney filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 is taken on record. Be tagged at the appropriate place.

¶15

Through this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of directions to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Rohtak, to transfer the Rent Petition bearing RP-20-2017 from the Court of Sh. Bharat, learned Rent Controller, Rohtak, to any other Court of learned Rent Controller.

¶16

Pursuant to the order dated 04.03.2022 of this Court, report from the concerned learned Rent Controller, Rohtak, vide letter No. 338 dated 25.03.2022 duly forwarded by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Rohtak, vide letter No. 1181 dated 29.03.2022, has been received.

¶17

RISHU KATARIA 2022.04.07 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this document. Chandigarh

¶18

CR-1255-2020

¶19

-2-

¶20

The learned Rent Controller, Rohtak, in her report dated 25.03.2022, has mentioned that due to Covid-19 Pandemic, the Court was working with restrictions and she was not aware that this case had to be decided in a time bound frame because when she took over the charge as Rent Controller, Rohtak, all clerical staff including Reader, were transferred. She has regretted for the aforesaid lapse on her part and requested for two months more time for disposal of the rent petition filed by the petitioner.

¶21

Dr. Tammanna R. Sahrawat, who is present in person states that she had moved an application dated 10.12.2019 (Annexure P-1), for transfer of her Rent Petition bearing RP-20-2017, from the Court of Sh. Bharat, Rent Controller, Rohtak, to another Court which was dismissed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Rohtak vide order dated 06.01.2020 (Annexure P-4). She further states that her main grievance has been redressed as Mr. Bharat, learned Rent Controller, Rohtak, against whom she had moved transfer application has since been transferred and now Ms. Neetika Bhardwaj, has taken over the charge as Rent Controller, Rohtak and now the case is to be heard and decided by her. Therefore, she seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision petition, with a direction to the learned Rent Controller, Rohtak, to decide her rent petition, expeditiously.

¶22

In view the above, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a direction to the learned Rent Controller, Rohtak, before whom the Rent Petition bearing No. RP-20 of 2017 is now fixed for final arguments to hear the arguments on the date fixed i.e.

¶23

RISHU KATARIA 2022.04.07 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this document. Chandigarh

¶24

CR-1255-2020 -3-

¶25

28.04.2022 and, if, not possible on the said date, then she will make all possible efforts to decide the matter expeditiously, on or before 30.05.2022.

¶26

A copy of this order be send to learned Rent Controller, Rohtak, through FAX as well.

¶27

The learned Rent Controller, Rohtak, shall send the compliance report to this Court, after deciding the case within the stipulated time.

¶28

April 06, 2022 (ASHOK KUMAR VERMA) rishu JUDGE

¶29

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

¶30

RISHU KATARIA 2022.04.07 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this document. Chandigarh

Ujjwal Sahrawat v. M/S Ajay Garments

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ujjwal Sahrawat v. M/S Ajay Garments

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Kaur Vs the State of Haryana and Others

Sunita Devi and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Anu and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Vikram @ Vicky Vs State of Haryana

Rakesh Kumar Alias Kesi Vs State of Punjab and Another

Sharafat Ali and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others