Dismissed

Krishan Lal v. Saroj Kumra

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Mar 2022CR/1123/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged the Appellate Court's assessment of Rs.15,000 per month as mesne profit for a shop in Jalandhar, arguing the rate was exorbitant compared to neighboring rents. The Court dismissed the petition, holding the assessment was correct based on the shop's commercial location and size, despite the absence of lease deeds for adjoining shops.

What did the court decide?

The petition challenging the mesne profit assessment stands dismissed.

Krishan Lal Vs Saroj Kumra — Punjab & Haryana HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CR-1123-2022 Decided on : 29.03.2022

Krishan Lal

...... Petitioner

Versus

Saroj Kumra ...... Respondent

¶7

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

¶8

Present : Mr. G.S.Madaan, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶9

¶10

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.(Oral)

¶11

The petitioner is impugning the order dated 24.01.2022 (Annexure P-10) passed by the Appellate Court, Jalandhar whereby Rs.15,000/- per month was assessed to be paid by him as mesne profit in respect of the demised premises.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that mesne profit, which has been assessed in the sum of Rs.15,000/- per month by the Appellate Authority is exorbitant and thus, requires to be scaled down. He further submits that even though it was brought to the notice of the Appellate Authority that the rate of rent in all the neighbouring shops in the vicinity of the demised shop was Rs.970/- per month, however, it gravely erred by ignoring the said fact while passing the impugned order and had instead gone ahead by assessing the mesne profit at almost hundred times the rent being paid by the tenants of the adjoining shops.

¶13

Heard learned counsel and perused the impugned order.

¶14

A perusal of the impugned order reveals that except for their oral averments with respect to the rent being charged by the landlords of the

¶15

SONIA BURA 2022.03.31 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

¶16

CR-1123-2022

¶17

-2-

¶18

neighbouring shops, neither the petitioner-tenant nor the landlord had placed on record any lease deed or rent deed of the adjoining shops, which stood rented out. Admittedly, the demised shop is located in a commercial hub and in a busy market of Jalandhar. In the circumstances, the Appellate Authority rightly on the basis of the location and size of the demised shop assessed the mesne profit in the sum of Rs.15,000/- per month.

¶19

Hence, no ground is made out to set aside the impugned order passed by the Appellate Court. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed.

¶20

		(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE
29.03.2022
sonia
	Whether speaking/reasoned:	Yes/No
	Whether reportable :	Yes/No

¶21

SONIA BURA 2022.03.31 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Krishan Lal v. Saroj Kumra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishan Lal v. Saroj Kumra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sujatha Raghunandan Vs Adjudicating Officer, Rera Punjab and Anr.

Onkar Singh (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Vs Ramesh Bhandari

Rasleen Kaur Vs Kulbir Singh Ahuja

Darshan Devi Vs State of Haryana

Dharampal Since Deceased through Lrs and Ors. Vs Rajesh Gupta

Balwant Singh Vs Kuldip Singh and Ors.