The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a civil revision petition challenging orders dismissing an interim injunction application. The judge held the court cannot reopen cases with new facts from recent elections.
Petition is disposed of; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
109
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 1048 of 2018 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 09.12.2022
Ram Bhaj
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Gram Panchayat Jhattipur, Tehsil Samalkha, District Panipat
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Ajay Singh Ghangas, Advocate for the respondent.
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
the district.
Heard the learned counsel representing the parties at length and
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.12.14 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and 3. integrity of this document
Civil Revision No. 1048 of 2018 (O&M) 2
with their able assistance, perused the paper-book.
disposed of.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
December 09, 2022 “DK”
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2022.12.14 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the interim injunction application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Bhaj
Gram Panchayat Jhattipur
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
