The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a contempt petition as infructuous in light of a detailed order passed in a connected case filed on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
280-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP NO. 1001 OF 2018 DATE OF DECISION: 21.11.2022
Krishan Devi and others …Petitioners
Versus
S. S. Dhillon, IAS and others …Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate, For the petitioners.
Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
In view of the detailed order of even date passed by this Court in CWP-14753-2011 titled “Nisha Rani and others v. Additional Deputy Commissioner and others ” , the instant contempt petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
Rule discharged.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE
November 21, 2022 shalini
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2022.12.06 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
��
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nisha Rani and others v. Additional Deputy Commissioner and othersDissented from
CWP-14753-2011
Krishan Devi and others
S. S. Dhillon, IAS and others
ARUN MONGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
