Single judge order permitting the appellant company to withdraw two commercial applications before the Arbitration Tribunal, with the caveat that any other pending miscellaneous applications are disposed of; no explicit disposal mentioned for the appeals themselves.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
5+6
1. CAPP-45-2015(O&M) Date of Order: 20.04.2022
F M HAMMERELE TEXTILES LTD ..Appellant
Versus
MASCHINEN UMWELTTECHNIK TRANSPORTANLAGEN GESELLSCHAFT GMBH AND ORS
..Respondents
2. CAPP-47-2015(O&M)
F M HAMMERELE TEXTILES LTD ..Appellant Versus
MASCHINEN UMWELTTECHNIK TRANSPORTANLAGEN GESELLSCHAFT GMBH AND ORS
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Yashpal Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocate Mr. Rahul Soi, Advocate for respondents.
Mr. Praveen Gupta, Advocate for applicant (in CMA-6-2022 in CAPP-45-2015 and CMA-7-2022 in CAPP-47-2015).
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral)
The learned counsel representing the appellant claims that he represents the successful resolution applicant and now the appellant-Company is under his control. He prays that he may be permitted to withdraw these appeals.
Ordered accordingly.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
April 20th , 2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) Ay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
CHETAN THAKUR 2022.07.04 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.
HAMMERELE TEXTILES LTD
MASCHINEN UMWELTTECHNIK TRANSPORTANLAGEN GESELLSCHAFT GMBH AND ORS
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
