M/S R.V. Associates v. State of Punjab and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In this arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the petitioner sought appointment of an independent arbitrator to adjudicate a dispute over alleged illegal stoppage of a government construction project and consequent losses. The court found the issue arbitrable and appointed an arbitrator.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Sh. Gurtej Singh as sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute; parties to bear fees in equal proportion.
What the court decided
ARB No. 66 of 2022 (O&M)
-1-
249
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARB No. 66 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.12.2022
M/s R.V. Associates
-Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
-Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the dispute regarding alleged illegal stoppage of work and pecuniary loss is arbitrable in nature.
Whether an independent sole arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11(6) to adjudicate the difference between parties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s R.V. Associates
- respondent
The State of Punjab
Coram
Raj Mohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- ARB/66/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sikka Rice and Genral Mills Ltd. Vs Haryana State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. and Anr.
Shaheed Udham Singh Education and Welfare Society Vs the Punjab Education Department Ans Ors.
M/S Kuber Constructions, Sangrur Vs Improvement Trust,Sangrur and Another
M/S Pritam Chand and Sons Vs Union of India and Others