The High Court appointed Sh. Vikrant Nehra as the sole arbitrator to resolve a dispute under a revenue sharing agreement upon the petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, noting the parties' consensus.
Appointment of Sh. Vikrant Nehra, Advocate, as the sole arbitrator to resolve the dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ARB No. 41 of 2022 (O&M)
-1-
234
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARB No. 41 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.12.2022
Mrs. Simrat Kaur and another
-Petitioners
Versus
M/s Mani Restaurants LLP
-Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Nitin Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral)
the tune of Rs.12 lacs, subject to final adjudication by the Arbitrator.
JYOTI SHARMA 2022.12.16 17:07 I attest to the authenticity and accuracy of this order/judgment
-2-
ARB No. 41 of 2022 (O&M)
is not in dispute.
JYOTI SHARMA 2022.12.16 17:07 I attest to the authenticity and accuracy of this order/judgment
-3-
ARB No. 41 of 2022 (O&M)
the following address:-
Sh. Vikrant Nehra, Advocate, C8/T2, Dilshad Garden, Delhi 09811421208
16.12.2022
Jyoti Sharma
(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) JUDGE
1.Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No 2.Whether reportable : Yes/No
JYOTI SHARMA 2022.12.16 17:07 I attest to the authenticity and accuracy of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an independent arbitrator should be appointed to adjudicate a dispute arising from a revenue sharing agreement.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Simrat Kaur and another
M/s Mani Restaurants LLP
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
