The Court dismissed the wife's application seeking transfer of matrimonial proceedings from Karnal to Jind, noting they had already been transferred to Assandh, which is closer to the petitioner's residence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT ASHOK KUMAR 2021.10.11 16:25 CHANDIGARH I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
MURTI DEVI
202
TA-732-2021
Date of decision: 08.10.2021 ..Petitioner
Versus
GURMEET SINGH
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Kunal Muthreja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. UK Agnihotri, Advocate for the respondent. ***
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
The hearing of the case was held through video conferencing on account of restricted functioning of the Courts.
This is an application filed by the wife with a prayer to transfer the proceedings in the petition bearing No.HMA/481/2021, titled as “Gurmeet Singh vs. Murti Devi” pending in the Family Court, Karnal, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Jind.
Mr. UK Agnihotri, Advocate, has entered appearance for the respondent and stated that as the Family Court has started functioning at Assandh, therefore, the proceedings have already been transferred to Assandh which is hardly 19 kms. away from the place of residence of the petitioner.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, no ground to transfer the petition is made out.
Dismissed.
All the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, are also
disposed of.
08.10.2021 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Murti Devi
Gurmeet Singh
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
